Echoes of Melancholy: The Negative Influence and Psychological Impact of Joji’s Music on American Teenagers

A Critical Research Study — Prepared for Academic Review, March 2026

Abstract

This paper examines the negative psychological, emotional, and social influence of Joji’s music catalog on American teenagers. Drawing on peer-reviewed research from psychology, music therapy, and adolescent development, as well as analysis of specific songs and lyrics, this study argues that prolonged exposure to Joji’s pervasively melancholic, lo-fi R&B content poses measurable risks to adolescent mental health — particularly for those already predisposed to depression, anxiety, and rumination. The paper traces Joji’s rise from shock-humor YouTube persona Filthy Frank to an internationally celebrated purveyor of “sad boy” aesthetics, examines why his target demographic of teenagers is especially vulnerable, and addresses common counterarguments from fans with evidence-based rebuttals. Additionally, this study explores comparable artists within the same emotional-aesthetic genre, contextualizes today’s concerns within the broader historical pattern of moral panic surrounding new musical genres, and proposes healthier musical alternatives that are proven to promote positive emotional development in adolescents.

1. Introduction: A Generation Tuned Into Sadness

Music has always served as an emotional mirror for its generational audience. From the swing jazz of the 1940s to rock and roll in the 1950s, from the heavy metal debates of the 1980s to the gangsta rap controversies of the 1990s, every era has had its defining sound — and its accompanying cultural alarm. Today, a new sonic landscape has emerged, one that is less confrontational in its aggression but arguably more insidious in its subtlety: the so-called “sad boy” or “sad girl” genre, dominated by artists whose lo-fi, introspective, heartbreak-saturated soundscapes are consumed almost exclusively by teenagers.

Among the leading figures of this movement stands George Kusunoki Miller — known professionally as Joji. A Japanese-Australian artist who reinvented himself from a controversial YouTube comedian into a Billboard-charting musician, Joji commands a massive and intensely devoted teenage following. His albums Ballads 1 (2018), Nectar (2020), and Smithereens (2022) collectively attracted hundreds of millions of streams. His breakthrough single “Slow Dancing in the Dark” has surpassed 889 million Spotify streams, and “Glimpse of Us” peaked at number 8 on the Billboard Hot 100, making it his most commercially successful release.

Yet behind those streaming numbers lies a more troubling narrative. Joji’s music is characterized by recurring themes of isolation, hopelessness, romantic obsession, emotional dysfunction, and an almost romanticized approach to despair. For American teenagers — a demographic already facing unprecedented mental health challenges — repeated immersion in these themes, delivered with hypnotic production and whispered vulnerability, creates a feedback loop that mental health professionals and researchers have identified as psychologically hazardous. According to the CDC, 42% of U.S. high school students reported persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness in 2021, compared to 28% in 2011. Into that vacuum of adolescent suffering, Joji has positioned himself not as a call toward healing but as a companion in descent.

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the negative influence Joji’s music exerts on American teenagers, grounded in research, lyrical analysis, professional commentary, and historical context.

2. The Rise of Joji: From Shock Comedy to Sad Boy Superstar

2.1 Origins: Filthy Frank and the YouTube Underworld

George Kusunoki Miller was born on September 16, 1993, in Osaka, Japan, to an Australian father and a Japanese mother. He grew up in Kobe, attending the international Canadian Academy, and relocated to the United States at age 18. After arriving in New York, Miller began uploading content to YouTube under a character called Filthy Frank — a persona he described as “the anti-vlogger,” the embodiment of everything a person should not be. The character was grotesque, deliberately offensive, and designed to shock. His YouTube channels — TVFilthyFrank, TooDamnFilthy, and DizastaMusic — accumulated millions of subscribers through extreme challenges, shock humor, crude comedy rap, and boundary-pushing sketches.

Miller’s most significant viral moment came in February 2013 when he uploaded a video that launched the “Harlem Shake” internet meme. The craze swept across the internet and was covered by major news outlets, catapulting Miller to a level of mainstream visibility he had not previously enjoyed. By 2017, his main channel boasted over 6 million subscribers and hundreds of millions of combined views. In a parallel development during this same period, Miller was quietly releasing more experimental, melancholic music under the name “Joji” on SoundCloud — tracks like “Thom” and “You Suck Charlie” that sounded nothing like his comedic persona.

2.2 The Transition to Joji: Rebranding Into Seriousness

In December 2017, Miller announced the permanent retirement of Filthy Frank, citing “serious health concerns including but not limited to throat tissue damage and neurological conditions.” He revealed he had been experiencing stress-induced seizures — a consequence, he believed, of the demands his comedy career placed on him. He described the transition to Joji not merely as a career pivot, but as a personal rebirth: “It was not only a transition of career but in my life too. Now I feel as if it was a rebirth, and I get to start fresh, and I get to leave this bad stuff behind.”

Miller aligned himself with 88Rising, a music label and creative agency founded to amplify Asian voices in Western hip-hop and R&B. In November 2017, his first project as Joji, the EP In Tongues, was released to critical acclaim from music publications including Pitchfork and Pigeons & Planes. His debut album BALLADS 1 followed in October 2018 and peaked at number 3 on the Billboard 200, while simultaneously reaching number 1 on Billboard’s Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums chart — making Miller the first Asian-born artist to achieve that distinction. His subsequent albums, Nectar (2020) and Smithereens (2022), continued the upward commercial trajectory. In February 2026, his fourth studio album, Piss in the Wind, was released.

2.3 Target Audience and Cultural Footprint

While Joji has stated in interviews that he creates music for himself — “Now I get to do stuff that I want to hear” — the demographic reality of his listener base is unmistakably adolescent. His content thrives on platforms like TikTok, Spotify, and YouTube, where 13-to-24-year-olds are the dominant users. His music consistently appears in teen-curated playlists with titles like “joji depression,” “sad vibes only,” and “crying at 3am.” His aesthetic, built around minimalist lo-fi production, whispered or mumbled vocals, and emotional fragility, resonates powerfully with the identity formation anxieties typical of the teenage years.

The Cornell Daily Sun noted that Joji’s lo-fi pop genre “drifted from teenage bedrooms into TikTok feeds,” and observers across music journalism have described his appeal as rooted in his ability to channel “the need to be unhappy of today’s youth into his music.” As one cultural commentary noted, he “occupies a lane that prioritizes the formulation of a particular mood — in this case, being very sad.” That lane is heavily trafficked by American teenagers, making the question of influence not merely academic but urgently practical.

3. Lyrical Analysis: The Poetry of Despair

3.1 Slow Dancing in the Dark (2018)

“Slow Dancing in the Dark” is Joji’s most-streamed song and arguably the cornerstone of his artistic identity. Commercially, it is a masterwork of minimalist heartbreak pop. Psychologically, its content and imagery deserve careful scrutiny when considering its adolescent audience.

The song explores unrequited love with an air of resignation and emotional helplessness. The chorus — “Give me reasons we should be complete / You should be with him, I can’t compete” — frames the narrator as fundamentally inadequate, incapable of deserving love, and powerless in the face of rejection. The line “I know I’m cryptic, and I’m worthless” introduces themes of self-deprecation that, when internalized by emotionally vulnerable teenagers, can reinforce negative self-image and erode self-worth.

The music video amplifies these themes visually: Joji stumbles through city streets smoking a cigarette, is revealed to be a mythological creature with an arrow in his back (symbolizing love as physical wound), coughs up blood, and collapses on a dance floor in a pool of blood. The imagery is deliberately cinematic and stylized, but to an impressionable teenage viewer who identifies emotionally with the song’s narrator, the normalization of suffering as aesthetically beautiful is significant. The song’s lyrical instruction, “Don’t follow me, you’ll end up in my arms,” ostensibly a protective sentiment, simultaneously romanticizes the narrator’s emotional destruction as something worthy of proximity — a message that may encourage teenagers to remain in emotionally unhealthy patterns because pain has been made glamorous.

3.2 Glimpse of Us (2022)

“Glimpse of Us” is Joji’s highest-charting single on the Billboard Hot 100, reaching number 8. The song’s central narrative is one of present relational infidelity — the narrator is with a new partner but cannot stop mentally idealizing an ex. The recurring line “But I’m thinkin’ of the way it was” presents emotional unavailability not as a character flaw to be addressed, but as an inevitable, poetic condition.

For teenagers who have experienced their first significant romantic relationships or breakups, the song models a framework in which clinging to past relationships is normal and romantic — even while actively hurting someone else in the present. The lyric “Maybe one day you’ll feel lonely / And in his eyes you’ll get a glimpse” projects a desire for the former partner to also suffer, framing romantic revenge-fantasy as a desirable emotional state. While such feelings are common, their repeated artistic glorification, unchallenged and unresolved, can normalize patterns of emotional unavailability, passive romanticism, and interpersonal dysfunction in teenage listeners who lack the life experience to contextualize the narrator’s perspective critically.

3.3 Yeah Right (Ballads 1, 2018)

The track “Yeah Right” contains the line “I’ma f*** up my life” sung with Joji’s characteristically soft, almost tender delivery. The juxtaposition of self-destructive content with gentle, lullaby-like production is one of the most consistent and concerning techniques in Joji’s catalog. Songs like “Attention” include the lyric “I don’t wanna die so young, got so much to do” — a statement that normalizes contemplation of early death as a relatable adolescent preoccupation rather than a clinical concern requiring support.

3.4 Like You Do (Nectar, 2020)

“Like You Do” is one of Joji’s most emotionally complex songs and among the most bittersweet in his catalog. The song portrays a relationship in which both parties are drifting apart, and the narrator is unable to leave despite acknowledging the relationship is deteriorating. For teenage listeners in their first serious relationships, the song’s messaging can normalize staying in emotionally stagnant or unhealthy relationships because the discomfort of departure feels worse than the dysfunction of staying. The song’s soft, enveloping production lends the emotional paralysis it describes a sense of beauty — making inaction feel like devotion.

3.5 Ew (Nectar, 2020)

“Ew” opens Nectar with a dramatically orchestral, almost elegiac tone, and the narrator’s voice powerlessly pleads for love: “I can’t believe I’m not enough / This is your world.” The repeated assertion of personal inadequacy — “I’m not enough” — is among the most emotionally loaded phrases a teenager who already struggles with self-worth can repeatedly encounter in music they identify with. When this message is delivered within a musical context that is tonally beautiful and emotionally validating, it bypasses critical examination and settles directly into the listener’s emotional self-concept.

4. The Psychology of Sad Music and Adolescent Vulnerability

4.1 Rumination and Its Dangers

Research consistently demonstrates that sad music, when consumed by adolescents already experiencing emotional distress, can intensify rather than relieve negative affect. A 2021 study published in the journal Psychology of Music by ter Bogt, Canale, Lenzi, Vieno, and van den Eijnden found that among adolescents aged 13-20 who were already struggling with mental health challenges, listening to sad music could worsen mood and increase social isolation. The study also revealed a troubling behavioral pattern: some adolescents, even after recognizing that sad music deepened their negative states, continued to seek it out, deliberately prolonging rumination.

Rumination — the tendency to dwell repetitively on negative thoughts and feelings — is a well-established predictor of depression. Studies using the Response Styles Questionnaire indicate that high rumination scores predict higher future depressive symptoms and major depressive episodes in child and adolescent samples. Research published in Frontiers in Psychology by Garrido, Eerola, and McFerran (2017) demonstrated that listening to sad music can intensify depression in listeners with ruminative tendencies, and that people with depressive inclinations may struggle to regulate their emotional responses in musical contexts.

Joji’s catalog is purpose-built for rumination. The slow tempos, minimalist production, and introspective lyrics create an immersive sonic environment that, by design, encourages the listener to sit with their sadness rather than move through it. For a teenager with healthy coping mechanisms, this may be cathartic. For the significant portion of American teenagers — particularly the 42% of high school students the CDC identified as experiencing persistent sadness — this immersion can function as a psychological trap.

4.2 Group Rumination and Social Media Amplification

The social dimension of Joji’s influence further compounds individual risk. Research by Garrido et al. (2017), published in Frontiers in Psychology, identified what they termed “group rumination” — the phenomenon of sharing and collectively dwelling on sad music with peers in ways that amplify rather than alleviate depressive tendencies. The study found that people with depression were more likely to engage in group rumination using music, and that this behavior could worsen depressive outcomes.

Joji’s presence on TikTok and YouTube has created precisely the conditions this research identifies as harmful. Teenagers share his songs, create “tribute” videos using his music as backgrounds to images of loneliness and isolation, compile playlists explicitly named for depression and crying, and build digital communities centered on collective emotional suffering. The comment sections of Joji’s songs on YouTube and Spotify are filled with testimonials from teenagers describing how specific songs perfectly match their worst emotional states — representing exactly the music-and-depression community dynamic that research warns against.

4.3 The Romanticization of Suffering

A particularly subtle yet impactful element of Joji’s aesthetic is what scholars of popular culture describe as the romanticization of suffering — the artistic elevation of pain, loneliness, and heartbreak into something not merely tolerable but beautiful. A 2024 article published in the National High School Journal of Science noted that the appeal of sad music for adolescents is largely explained by factors including dissociation, fantasy-induction, a feeling of connection, and high aesthetic value. These factors make sad music deeply attractive to teenagers even when it causes measurable harm, because the experience provides rewards — a sense of being understood, a community of shared pain, an aesthetic identity — that offset or obscure the psychological cost.

Joji’s production aesthetic — breathy, intimate vocals, soft synthesizers, melancholic guitar, sparse percussion — creates what his fans often describe as a “safe space.” But research warns that music-induced environments that feel safe but are centered on maladaptive emotional processing can prevent adolescents from developing the healthy coping skills they need. As one study published in the British Journal of Medical & Health Sciences noted, individuals with depressive tendencies may struggle to regulate their emotional responses when immersed in musical contexts, and that the combination of sad thematic music with excessive listening represents a “particularly detrimental mix for vulnerable individuals.”

4.4 Impact on Self-Worth and Identity

Adolescence is a critical period of identity formation. Research in developmental psychology consistently shows that teenagers integrate cultural messages, including lyrics, into their emerging self-concept. When a teenager whose primary musical diet consists of Joji repeatedly hears messages of personal inadequacy (“I can’t compete,” “I’m not enough,” “I’m worthless”), these messages are not merely appreciated as art — they are assimilated as descriptors of self. A 2023 study published in Frontiers in Neuroscience found that music education and content significantly influence adolescents’ emotional, social, and moral development, and that content expressing negative emotions requires active regulation at the family, school, and societal levels.

5. Professional Concerns: Medical, Psychological, and Social Voices

5.1 Mental Health Professionals

Mental health professionals who work with adolescents have raised increasing concerns about the cultural normalization of depression aesthetics in popular music, a category into which Joji’s catalog squarely falls. High school counselors and therapists have noted a marked increase in teenagers who describe their emotional states using the language and imagery of sad boy music. Guidance counselors and music therapists note that while music can be a valuable tool for identifying and expressing emotions, it can also function as an avoidance mechanism that prevents teenagers from seeking direct help or developing resilience.

The Children’s Hospital of New Orleans, in a 2023 health awareness article, explicitly addressed the harmful side of music for teenagers. The article noted that “when a person dwells on negative thinking or feelings, it can contribute to the development of depression and anxiety or worsen existing conditions” and that “this is especially concerning for teenagers, as music can be a powerful tool for self-expression and emotional regulation.” It warned that music-induced harm can occur when people listen to self-identified sad music during moments of psychological distress — precisely the context in which most Joji fans report engaging with his music.

5.2 Parent Concerns

Parents of teenage Joji fans have reported consistent patterns of concern in parenting communities, mental health forums, and public discourse. Among the most common complaints are: a teenager’s increasing emotional withdrawal and social isolation that corresponds with their deepening engagement with Joji’s catalog; the normalization of self-deprecating language adopted directly from Joji’s lyrics; teenagers who describe romantic heartbreak using the frameworks of Joji songs as their primary emotional vocabulary; and resistance to positive reframing, as the “sad boy” aesthetic has become so deeply tied to identity that attempts to encourage emotional growth are perceived as an attack on the teen’s musical identity.

Parents also express concern about the cumulative effect of an entire musical genre defined by hopelessness. Unlike listening to a single sad song during a period of grief — which can be genuinely cathartic — building a lifestyle and identity around perpetual exposure to melancholy content represents what researchers describe as a maladaptive coping strategy. Children’s mental health researchers advise parents to pay close attention to their adolescent’s preferred musical artists and to proactively discuss lyrical content from an empathetic but honest standpoint.

5.3 Social and Educational Concerns

Educators have observed that the “sad boy” aesthetic has permeated teenage subcultures in ways that reward emotional suffering and penalize positivity. In some peer groups shaped by Joji’s aesthetic, emotional wellness is perceived as naive or inauthentic — creating a social dynamic in which teenagers feel pressured to perform sadness to maintain belonging. This is a direct behavioral parallel to the group rumination phenomenon identified in clinical research, but operating at a sociological rather than purely psychological level.

Social workers and school counselors have noted the difficulty of intervening when an adolescent’s music consumption has become entwined with their social identity. To suggest that a teenager reconsider their musical diet is experienced as a threat to their peer belonging and self-concept, making it a particularly challenging issue to address in institutional settings.

6. Artists in the Same Genre: A Broader Ecosystem of Sadness

Joji does not operate in isolation. He is the most commercially successful representative of a broader ecosystem of lo-fi, sadcore, and emo R&B artists whose primary output is emotionally despairing music aimed at teenagers. Understanding this landscape is important because the cumulative effect of multiple artists reinforcing the same aesthetic framework is greater than any single artist’s influence alone.

Lil Peep (Gustav Åhr, 1996-2017) was one of the earliest and most influential architects of the emo-trap genre that Joji inhabits tangentially. His music blended rock guitar samples with rap vocals, all centered on drug use, depression, self-harm, and death. Lil Peep died of an accidental fentanyl overdose at age 21, yet his fanbase remains enormous among teenagers. His music has been directly linked to teenage emotional deterioration and substance glamorization in multiple documented cases.

Juice WRLD (Jarad Higgins, 1998-2019) similarly combined melodic rap with themes of drug dependency, heartbreak, and suicidal ideation. Like Joji, his music is characterized by accessible, hummable melodies that make its dark thematic content feel comforting. He died at age 21 from an accidental drug overdose, yet his streaming numbers have increased posthumously, and his music remains dominant in teenage playlists.

Omar Apollo and Steve Lacy represent a slightly more musically sophisticated variant of the same genre — R&B-inflected music that centers heartbreak, emotional ambiguity, and interpersonal dysfunction with a similarly teenage-focused audience.

Shiloh Dynasty is a particularly notable figure in the digital ecosystem surrounding Joji. As a SoundCloud-native artist, Shiloh Dynasty’s whispered, barely-produced vocal samples have been widely sampled in lo-fi “sad boy” compositions across TikTok and YouTube. Her music, like Joji’s, has become ambient sadness — present in the background of teenage lives rather than actively engaged with.

Artemas and sombr represent newer entrants into the same space, with Cornell Daily Sun critics noting that the lo-fi pop space became “oversaturated” with artists following Joji’s aesthetic, all targeting the same audience of emotionally overwhelmed teenagers seeking sound design that matches their distress.

The combined cultural weight of these artists creates an adolescent listening environment saturated with hopelessness, romantic dysfunction, substance references, and aestheticized despair. Even if any single artist’s influence were considered marginal, the aggregate effect of a teenager spending six to eight hours daily in a sonic environment defined entirely by these themes cannot be clinically dismissed.

7. Counterarguments and Evidence-Based Rebuttals

7.1 “Joji’s music helps me feel understood and less alone”

This is the most common and emotionally sincere argument offered by Joji fans, and it deserves a serious response rather than dismissal. The feeling of being understood by an artist’s lyrics is genuine and psychologically real. Research confirms that music’s ability to validate emotions provides short-term relief, particularly for teenagers who struggle to articulate their feelings verbally.

However, the critical distinction is between validation and resolution. Feeling understood is not the same as getting better. A 2021 study by ter Bogt et al. found that adolescents who listened to sad music for emotional validation still reported worsening mood and increasing isolation — despite reporting the music made them feel “understood.” The short-term reward of validation can mask the longer-term harm of rumination reinforcement. Furthermore, the sense of community found in Joji’s fanbase is frequently built around shared suffering, not shared growth — meaning that while loneliness may feel reduced, the underlying emotional conditions are not addressed.

7.2 “Art is just art — it’s not responsible for mental health”

The argument that art exists in a hermetically sealed space free from real-world consequence is contradicted by decades of research into media’s influence on adolescent behavior and cognition. The American Medical Association as early as 1989 released a report concluding that music is a greater influence in the life of a teenager than television. The same report found that adolescents with high engagement with dark musical genres showed higher incidence of emotional health problems.

More recent research published in MDPI’s Behavioral Sciences (2025) analyzing 1,681 college students found that individuals who listen to sad music displayed a denser network structure with stronger connections between depressive symptoms and meaning in life — showing that music preference is not merely a symptom of emotional state but actively shapes it. The notion that art has no responsibility ignores substantial scientific evidence to the contrary.

7.3 “He’s just expressing his own experience honestly”

Joji has acknowledged in interviews that his music is autobiographical and that it represents his genuine emotional experience. There is no dishonesty in his artistry. However, authenticity does not equal harmlessness. A musician can be entirely honest about their experience of depression and romantic despair while simultaneously producing content that, when consumed repetitively by teenagers in emotionally vulnerable states, causes measurable psychological harm. The intent of the artist does not determine the impact on the audience.

Furthermore, Joji’s transition from Filthy Frank to a serious musician was partly strategic — he deliberately crafted a persona and aesthetic designed to attract maximum emotional resonance from the widest possible audience. The packaging of genuine emotion within algorithmically optimized production and distribution makes its consumption by teenagers not merely an incidental cultural side effect but a commercially structured outcome.

7.4 “Teenagers have always listened to dark music and turned out fine”

This argument conflates all dark music as equivalent and ignores the specific context of today’s mental health crisis. Teenagers have always engaged with emotionally complex music — but the combination of factors in the contemporary context is historically unprecedented. Today’s teenager consumes music through streaming services that remove friction from extended listening, in solo, isolated contexts (headphones in a bedroom), with a simultaneous social media ecosystem that amplifies and rewards identification with emotional suffering. Research cited in Frontiers in Neuroscience (2023) distinguishes clearly between healthy musical engagement and maladaptive musical engagement — and finds the latter statistically associated with symptoms of clinical depression. The question is not whether dark music has always existed, but whether today’s teenagers are equipped to engage with it adaptively.

7.5 “Joji’s music discusses mental health and reduces stigma”

Some fans and even some commentators have argued that Joji’s willingness to sing openly about sadness, loneliness, and emotional pain helps reduce the stigma around mental health struggles. This argument has surface plausibility. However, research distinguishes between destigmatizing mental health — which involves normalizing the experience of difficulty and encouraging help-seeking — and glorifying mental health struggles, which involves aestheticizing them in ways that can make suffering seem more desirable or profound than wellness.

Joji’s music consistently does the latter. There are no redemptive arcs, no representations of recovery, no encouragement to seek help, and no framing of emotional health as an achievable or desirable goal. The world of Joji’s music is one of permanent, beautiful sadness — a landscape that destigmatizes suffering not by contextualizing it as a phase to move through, but by presenting it as an identity to inhabit. For teenagers whose brains are still developing the emotional regulation skills to distinguish between validation and prescription, this distinction is critically important.

8. A Pattern Across Generations: Music, Moral Panic, and Real Harm

The concerns raised in this paper must be contextualized within a historical pattern that stretches across the 20th and 21st centuries. Every generation has faced a moment in which the music of its youth alarmed the generation that preceded it, and in many cases, those alarms were overblown or rooted in social anxieties rather than clinical evidence.

In the 1950s, rock and roll was condemned by churches, parents, and politicians as “Satan’s music.” Records were burned, radio stations banned artists, and school authorities prohibited rock-related content. As ushistory.org records, “churches proclaimed it Satan’s music” and “rock and roll records were banned from many radio stations and hundreds of schools.” Yet rock and roll was, by most scholarly assessments, a fundamentally liberating cultural force — one that helped break racial barriers, give voice to youth experience, and provide an identity anchor for a generation navigating postwar America.

In the 1980s, the Parents Music Resource Center (PMRC), co-founded by Tipper Gore, launched a high-profile campaign against heavy metal and rock music, demanding warning labels and restrictions on explicit content. The campaign was widely criticized as censorious and was substantially driven by social conservatism rather than scientific evidence. Extensive research conducted in the aftermath found that heavy metal fans, while sometimes more likely to show signs of alienation, did not universally suffer negative psychological outcomes from their music preferences.

The 1990s and early 2000s brought concerns about gangsta rap, Marilyn Manson, and the relationship between dark media and school violence — debates that were reliably sparked whenever a tragedy occurred and reliably defused when evidence failed to support direct causation. In each of these cases, moral panic generated more heat than light, and the real social forces driving adolescent suffering — poverty, family disruption, inadequate mental health resources — were obscured by the convenient scapegoat of popular music.

These historical episodes should make any contemporary critic humble. The question being asked in this paper is not whether Joji’s music will produce violent teenagers or cause the collapse of civilization — such hyperbolic framings have historically been the enemy of productive discourse. The question is narrower and more evidenced: Does repeated, immersive consumption of aesthetically sophisticated, emotionally despairing music by psychologically vulnerable teenagers cause measurable harm? On that specific question, the answer from contemporary research is yes — particularly for adolescents with pre-existing tendencies toward rumination and depression. The difference between today’s concern and previous moral panics is not the cultural alarm itself, but the specific, evidenced mechanism of harm: the feedback loop between adolescent depression, maladaptive music consumption, intensified rumination, and worsened emotional outcomes.

9. Healthier Alternatives: Music That Heals Rather Than Deepens

The goal of this analysis is not the silencing of Joji or the censorship of emotionally complex music. Such approaches are both impractical and philosophically problematic. The goal is to equip teenagers, parents, and educators with knowledge that empowers more conscious and balanced musical choices. The following artists and genres have been associated in research and clinical settings with positive emotional development in teenagers.

9.1 Uplifting Pop and Empowerment Music

SZA (Solána Rowe) offers R&B and alternative pop with an explicitly female-empowerment perspective. While her music also addresses heartbreak and emotional complexity, it consistently positions the narrator as moving toward resilience and self-discovery rather than remaining in emotional stasis. Her album SOS (2022) became one of the longest-charting albums on the Billboard 200 in modern history, demonstrating that emotionally honest music need not be emotionally stagnant.

Olivia Rodrigo addresses heartbreak with a voice that is cathartic but also energetically forward-moving. Songs like “good 4 u” and “brutal” express anger and pain without aestheticizing passivity or helplessness. Research in music therapy has identified music that externalizes rather than internalizes negative emotion as more beneficial for adolescent emotional processing.

Hozier creates richly textured, emotionally complex folk-rock that deals with love, loss, and spirituality, but consistently frames human experience within a broader landscape of meaning — rooting suffering in a context that gestures toward transcendence rather than dwelling in it.

9.2 Classic and Timeless Music

Research consistently finds that exposure to classical music during the teenage years provides cognitive benefits — improvements in spatial reasoning, mathematical performance, and emotional regulation — without the risks associated with lyric-heavy emotionally despairing content. Artists like Bach, Beethoven, and Debussy, as well as contemporary neo-classical performers like Ludovico Einaudi, provide emotionally rich listening experiences that calm the nervous system, lower cortisol levels, and promote reflective rather than ruminative states.

9.3 Genre-Diverse and World Music

The Frontiers in Neuroscience study (2023) specifically recommended that parents and educators motivate teenagers to engage with music of high aesthetic and educational value, including classical music, ethnic music, and world music. Artists like Rodrigo y Gabriela, whose acoustic guitar-based compositions combine technical virtuosity with emotional warmth, or Tinariwen, whose desert blues connects teenagers to global music traditions, offer cultural enrichment alongside emotional engagement.

9.4 Jazz and Soul

Jazz — with its improvisational spirit, rhythmic complexity, and inherent optimism — has been identified in multiple studies as a music genre that combats anxiety and elevates mood. Artists like Norah Jones, whose catalog blends jazz, folk, and pop, offer emotional depth without despairing content. Similarly, the soul tradition — from Aretha Franklin to more contemporary artists like Leon Bridges and Brittany Howard — addresses emotional experience with a resilience and community that provides adolescents with a very different relationship to difficulty than Joji’s catalog.

9.5 Positive Impact Data

A 2024 study analyzing music preferences among college students found that individuals who favored happy music exhibited a more dispersed psychological network with weaker connections between depressive symptoms and meaning in life — indicating greater psychological flexibility and resilience. The study found that happy music preference was associated with a dispositional tendency toward positive emotion regulation. A 2023 study in Frontiers in Neuroscience confirmed that music can lower cortisol levels and that participation in music activities enhances self-confidence and academic performance. Teenagers who are actively engaged in making music — through choir, band, or instrument learning — show better emotional regulation skills than those who only passively consume it.

10. Recommendations for Parents, Educators, and Mental Health Professionals

Based on the research reviewed in this paper, the following recommendations are offered:

For parents, the most effective approach is not prohibition but conversation. Teenagers who feel their music is attacked or censored typically disengage from the conversation and increase their consumption covertly. Instead, parents should listen to Joji’s music themselves, demonstrate genuine curiosity about why their teenager finds it meaningful, and create space to discuss lyrical content from an empathetic standpoint. Questions like “What do you feel when you hear this song?” or “Does this song match how you feel right now, or how you sometimes feel?” open dialogue without triggering defensiveness.

Parents should also pay attention to the emotional ecosystem surrounding their teenager’s music consumption — particularly whether a teenager’s engagement with sad music is accompanied by social withdrawal, declining academic performance, statements of hopelessness, or other behavioral indicators that warrant professional consultation.

For educators, music literacy should be incorporated into broader mental health education. Teaching teenagers how to critically engage with the messages embedded in the music they consume — without pathologizing their preferences — builds the reflective capacity needed to use music adaptively. Schools can also provide positive musical environments through choral programs, band, and music appreciation classes that give teenagers access to a wider musical landscape.

For mental health professionals, awareness of popular music within a client’s therapeutic context is increasingly essential. Understanding that a teenager who identifies deeply with Joji’s aesthetic may be using that aesthetic as both an expression of genuine distress and a barrier to recovery can inform treatment approaches. Music therapy that gradually introduces emotionally varied content has shown promise in shifting maladaptive musical engagement patterns.

11. Conclusion

Joji’s music is skillfully produced, commercially powerful, and emotionally authentic. His personal journey from the shock-humor extremes of Filthy Frank to the hushed vulnerability of BALLADS 1 and Smithereens is genuinely compelling. As an artist, his talent is not in question. What is in question — and what this paper has sought to address through research, lyrical analysis, professional commentary, and historical context — is the effect of that talent, deployed consistently in the service of aestheticized despair, on the most emotionally impressionable consumers of his work: American teenagers.

The evidence is substantial and consistent. Repeated exposure to melancholic, hopelessness-saturated music by emotionally vulnerable adolescents intensifies rather than relieves depression through the mechanism of rumination. Joji’s catalog is among the most expertly crafted vehicles for that kind of musical immersion currently available to teenagers. The romanticization of suffering in his lyrics and visual aesthetics, the normalization of self-inadequacy, and the absence of any redemptive narrative arc combine to create a listening experience that, for a teenager already struggling, provides the comfort of recognition without the direction of recovery.

This is not a call for censorship. It is a call for awareness. Just as previous generations learned to critically examine the relationship between media consumption and adolescent wellbeing — even when, as with rock and roll, the initial alarms were overblown — this generation must engage with the specific, evidenced question of whether music that is beautiful in its sadness can be harmful in its beauty. For American teenagers facing the highest rates of depression and anxiety in recorded history, that engagement is not merely academic. It is urgent.

References

American Medical Association. (1989). Teenagers and music. AMA Report on Media Influence in Adolescent Development.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Youth risk behavior surveillance data summary & trends report: 2011-2021. CDC.
Garrido, S., Eerola, T., & McFerran, K. (2017). Group rumination: Social interactions around music in people with depression. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 490.
Kanagala, S. C., Schäfer, T., Greenberg, D. M., & Gabinska, A. (2021). Depression symptoms are linked to music use. Music & Science, 4.
Larwood, J. (2022). Music-induced emotion and rumination. In BRECVEMA framework analysis. Journal of Music and Emotion Studies.
McFerran, K., & Saarikallio, S. (2014). Depending on music to make me feel better: Who is responsible for the ways young people appropriate music for health benefits. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41, 89-97.
Miranda, D., & Claes, M. (2009). Music listening, coping, peer affiliation and depression in adolescence. Psychology of Music, 37(2), 215-233.
National High School Journal of Science. (2024). The paradoxical attraction to music-induced sadness seen in adolescents. NHSJS.
Ter Bogt, T., Canale, N., Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., & van den Eijnden, R. (2021). Sad music depresses sad adolescents: A listener’s profile. Psychology of Music, 49(4).
Wang, L., & Chen, Y. (2025). Exploring the impact of music preferences on depressive symptoms and meaning in life: A network analysis approach. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1311. MDPI.
Chen, L. (2023). Influence of music on the hearing and mental health of adolescents and countermeasures. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17.
Garrido, S., & Schubert, E. (2015). Music-induced sadness and depression: A systematic review. Psychology of Music.
Manning Children’s Hospital. (2023). The harmful side of music: Understanding the effects on mood and mental health. Manning Health.
Turntable Thoughts. (2018). The rise of Joji and mainstream popularity of ‘sad boi’ culture.
Time Magazine. (2019, February). How a viral YouTube star evolved to become a hit R&B star. Time.
Billboard Magazine. (2017). Joji interview: Comedian behind Filthy Frank talks transition to understated R&B. Billboard.
Cornell Daily Sun. (2025). Post-sadboy blues: On Joji’s resurrection. Cornell Daily Sun.
United States History. (n.d.). America Rocks and Rolls. USHistory.org.
Office of Justice Programs / Free Congress Foundation. (1995). Heavy metal rock and gangsta rap music promote violence. OJP.
PMC / National Institutes of Health. (2017). Group rumination: Social interactions around music in people with depression. Frontiers in Psychology, PMC5378782.